A subject will generally feel what they expect to feel. The hypnotist's skill is unimportant - it is the subject's belief system that matters. If the 'best hypnotist in the world' were to go on stage to hypnotise an entire audience, the entire audience might well go into hypnosis IF they knew he was 'the best hypnotist in the world'. If, on the other hand, they believed he was a just a truck driver acting the part of a hypnotist for fun, they simply would not go into any form of trance at all. Or would not believe they had.

Too many hypnotists and hypnotherapists believe their own publicity, and imagine that they have some sort of control over their subjects and the ability to 'make' them do things they wouldn't normally do.

But you simply cannot know whether or not an individual would like to be able to perform a particular act in a normal waking state. Hypnosis lowers the critical faculties - that is well established. It is deinhibiting. So an individual may then feel able to behave in some extrovert or outrageous way that s/he would normally find 'impossible'. But they are not being MADE to do anything - they are being ALLOWED to do something.

The confused belief arise out of the fact that people may well do things they would not, or could not, normally do - but they will not do things that they genuinely would not WANT to do. For it is the moral code, the true underlying belief of what is wrong and what is right that cannot be breached by hypnosis. It might be breached by convincing the subject in some way that the proposed action actually fitted in with their moral belief, but that would not be hypnosis, it would be NLP reframing. A simple command given under hypnosis could not do it, however skilled the hypnotist.

Dont Believe All You See

Stage hypnosis can have you believing all sorts of silly things. But those individuals have been selected by the stage hypnotist for their hysteric nature and their suggestibility. And when, on stage, they are told to 'sleep now' there are not a lot of people who have the nerve, in front of an audience, to say: "Sorry! It hasn't worked!" So they sleep. Now they've done it! They have tacitly accepted that they are hypnotised, and because every body knows they are hypnotised, they will have to do whatever they are asked to do - within reason. They can always disown it after the show, by saying: "Well, I don't remember. After all, I was hypnotised, wasn't I?"

I have carried out literally thousands of inductions, mostly for clinical and therapeutic reasons, but a few for experiment. With few exceptions, people have reported that they felt exactly as they were led to believe they would feel. Or said they did.

I have also spoken to a large number of individuals who have participated in stage hypnosis shows. When asked how they felt, most said that 'they hadn't gone under' but had had to pretend they had, out of embarrassment. Most of those that insisted they were 'well gone' changed their mind as soon as I told them I was a professional in the field and that I know that there is actually no such thing as a 'hypnotised feeling'. Anywhere between a complete retraction and a mild qualifying statement - "Oh, well, of course I did ham it up a bit... but only a bit, really." One or two insisted that whatever, they were truly 'out of it'. Hmm. Only got their word for that, of course. If they were, how do they know that they were?

False Memory or False Belief?

The following excerpt is part of a talk given in September 1995

Much has been made of what is usually referred to as the 'terrifying ease' with which false memories can be created. Several experiments have been documented and quoted. All useless. You only have an individual's word for what s/he perceives as real or imaginary. There is absolutely no known way of testing for the reality of a claimed memory, other than by diligent checking of indisputable corroborating evidence.

Now, I believe that even if a hypnotist can create an impression in his subject's mind that seems like reality, that feeling of reality will last for only a very short time. But what is eminently easy to create is the absolute belief that an event has happened - a truth, if you like, but not an actual memory.

The more influence one individual has over another, the easier it is to create that belief. Try this: imagine that a relative has shown you a picture of yourself, at about four years old or so, with your arm in plaster. Now you don't remember anything of this, so you ask your relative, who tells you that you had fallen off a swing and broken your arm. Now you have a belief, but it's not a memory. But you'd still vigorously defend that knowledge that you'd broken your arm, because you've seen the photo, and your relative has confidently told you what happened, so it must be so. And you'll remember the belief.

Elder and Child

Now let's shift things around a bit. In hypnotherapy, who's playing the part of the wise elder and who's playing the part of the child? Let us assume that you assure your client confidently that his/her symptom is always connected to a specific event. As far as the client is concerned, you're the one who knows. So you must be right. During therapy, it would be an easy matter to convince him/her that several recalls all pointed in that same direction, and then your client would have a belief that he or she may vigorously defend, but they still don't have an actual memory of the event. A tale will very likely be fabricated, for several reasons - as a 'proof' to justify the stated belief, feelings of stupidity for not being able to remember, transference, the need to find a reason for the way they are, fear of 'losing face', etc.

And it is worth remembering that we only ever have an individual's word that they are actually remembering what they say they are remembering. And they can't lose. Because, if their tale is subsequently shown to be untrue, all they have to say is: "But it seemed so real... that therapist must have somehow put it into my mind..."

As a matter of interest if you believe I'm talking about false memories of sexual abuse, then you're about to realise just how easily your client can get the idea into his or her head... because I've not made any mention of sexual matters at all.

OK, I've been talking about false memory syndrome and it's usually associated with sexual matters because that's the sort of false memory that's been causing problems, but that's merely a conditioning factor which your clients have been exposed to as well, because it's been in the media so frequently.

If You Talk Repression........

So if you talk about repression or 'buried memories' to your client, you've almost certainly got them thinking along sexual lines. For what it's worth, I usually tell them that we're searching for unfinished childhood business which can be minor, or maybe not so minor, but either way it's something which bothered the child so much that they simply kicked it under the carpet, so to speak, where it still lies.

Then I quote them a couple of case histories which are decidedly non sexual to illustrate more clearly what I'm talking about. Sometimes, they ask me if I think it could be anything sexual. Sometimes they ask me if I find much sexual abuse as a cause of people's problems. I always say the same thing. I tell them that I find such a wide variety of causes of client problems that I long ago gave up speculating about it and prefer to wait and see instead.

Actually, I believe that the only true false memory of this sort is the negative one - a memory that absolutely nothing of that sort ever happened. That's not to say, of course, that when someone is certain that nothing ever happened then they are necessarily wrong.

Now, of course, we do find memories of sexual abuse surfacing. For our purposes here, I'm talking about sexual abuse in it's most obvious and elemental form, the truly sexual event in a form which the average person in the street would recognise as such. So - we're talking about groping, fingering, enforced masturbation, and penetration or attempted penetration of mouth, anus, or vagina.

There are several possibilities to consider.

1. Has been abused and knows it. They've been abused, they know it, and our job with that client is to get them to release the guilt connected to it, because it's that which has been repressed. I've not yet had a client with this memory who had not got repressed guilt and fear. They let go of these emotions readily as a rule and we're unlikely to find ourselves with any real problems here.

2. Has been abused but does not know it. When they find it, they are incredulous at first, often thinking it's imagination. I usually say that it might be, but stay with it anyway, if it's what their mind wants to do. If it's a true memory, it will soon become real enough. There's usually huge emotional release - if you use a bio-feedback meter, you can't miss it, I promise you. Sometimes, the emotional arousal appears to be missing at first - no mystery, if you understand the nature of abreaction.

3. Has not been abused as such. If they get the idea into their head that they have been, they might begin to act accordingly, because those that latch onto the idea are usually Hysterics. The giveaway is a too-ready acceptance of the memory as reality with out of balance emotional responses. Again, the bio-feedback meter comes into its own, because if any arousal shows, it's going to be below the level you'd expect from the evidence of your eyes and ears. Trust the meter.

4. Does not want to discover abuse. It's often there in these cases, but you'll have difficulty getting them to face it, and sometimes a fair degree of negative transference, manifesting as anger, when they do. Once they have discharged the associated emotions, though, they'll usually announce that they don't feel anywhere near as bad as they had always believed they would if they found such a thing.

5. Wants to discover abuse. The dodgy one. He or she will seize on the tiniest shred of what they perceive to be evidence. They are usually Anal/Hysteric personalities and will attempt to get you to tell them that they're looking at abuse here. These people are dangerous to us, because if they make some sort of accusation about a relative somewhere along the line, only to discover that they could not possibly be right, then they're going to insist that their therapist must've put it into their mind. And they'd be believed.

So we really do have to be enormously careful. A child is dependent upon adults for their survival and their intention is generally to please. Their false beliefs may very well be detailed and dramatic, if they think that's what you want. Again, who is playing the role of the elder and who is playing the role of the child during therapy?

If you allow your client one tiny sniff of what you're seeking, then the chances are that you'll find it.

--------- end of talk excerpt -------

Not surprisingly, several of those present took issue with me about my assertion that false memories do not exist as such. So I asked if anybody could give me a false memory and was quickly assured that any one present could (they were all therapists). I asked if they could give me a false memory of having won a million pounds at a Casino. Apparently not. It was tentatively suggested that only bad memories could be induced, 'because of the way the psyche works'. So I suggested they gave me a memory of having won and lost a million pounds in one evening at the Casino. Again, not a likely proposition apparently, though nobody seemed clear why this should be so. Not sexual enough, I reckon, and therefore not fashionable enough.

In a connected vein, it's very interesting to realise that in the 70's, it was not sexual abuse that was considered to be the cause of all our problems; it was parental neglect. Then, huge numbers of individuals who underwent any form of psychotherapy discovered just that in their past...

Satanic ritual, sexual abuse, neglect, bloody trauma or alien abduction.... be careful what you look for, because you - and your client - are sure to find it.

© Copyright Terence Watts, 1995 (excerpt) & 1996